Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Michigan promotes Ergonomic Standard

Interesting that a state that is one of the hardest hit with recent economic woes is considering an ergonomic standard. Maybe someone gets it that ergonomics isn't a costly benefit, but cost reducing. Although I am not convinced that legislation is the way to go.

The state's regulators voted unanimously to advance it on January 14, despite opposition from the business community. Its supporters maintain the rule will reduce preventable injuries that cost employers millions in worker's compensation and lost time. Opponents argue it will raise the cost of doing business at a time many employers are struggling because of the state’s ailing economy.

The unanimous vote by the General Industry Safety Standards Commission and the Occupational Health Standards Commission increases the odds that efforts to derail the standard won’t succeed this time round.

According to the Michigan Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth (DLEG), the proposed standard would “assess risk factors that may contribute to work-related musculoskeletal disorders and establish a minimal rule for training.” It also would apply only to businesses in general industry, not construction, DLEG said.

Public hearings will be held before the rule can be formally adopted by the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA). It could be in place in as little as six months.

Now in draft form, it requires:
• All employees to be given ergonomics training covering occupational risk factors for MSDs, symptoms, and reporting procedures
• Employers to be responsible for involving employees; assessing risk factors; and eliminating, reducing or controlling ergonomic hazards "where economically and technically feasible"
• Employers with an existing "effective ergonomic program" to be examined for prior compliance with the requirements

The Michigan Worker’s Compensation Bureau estimated that ergonomics-related hazards accounted for some 40 percent of the claims paid in the state in 2006 and 2007.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I certainly agree that ergonomics ought to become standard in the workplace, but I to do not necessarily agree on legislation.

For example, I met one lady who was completely outfitted ergonomically at work, but went home, spent hours on her non-outfitted desk, developed back and wrist issues, sued her company and won!

There has to be some... resolution!